In terms of costs, watts per pound ratio and power efficiency the 1.5 kW++++
tube amp still wins hands down from the solid state amps. The only advantage
of a multiple module solid state amp seems the added redundancy due to the
multiple modules.
Cheers, Dick
PA3DUV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Theo Bellamy" <theo.bellamy@spirittelecom.com>
To: "Ampscontestingcom" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:13 PM
Subject: [Amps] SS vs. Tubes (was "I gotta tell this")
> Cliff N7HIY wrote:
>
>>the broadcast, commercial and military transmitter industry has long ago
>>switched from archaic tube amplifier technology to solid state devices.
>>we, ham radio, are the laggards in the change of technology
>
> I really wish I could get excited about building an amp with solid state
> devices. I know we are not on the cutting edge when we build amps with
> 813s
> from WW2 or Russian Tank Radar tubes, but the transistors just seem so ...
> how can I put it? .... boring and lifeless. Maybe if I saw some really
> interesting looking homebrew ham amps with transistors I could get
> interested. But they all look like aluminum show boxes. There is just
> something about hurling electrons through a vacuum with great heat,
> guiding
> their flow with a little voltage as they slam into a metal plate with a
> high
> and lethal voltage applied, hoping you have things adjusted correctly
> where
> it won't self destruct in a flash of sparks and smoke. This all seems
> natural to me. The way God himself wants amplifiers to be. There is just
> something slightly evil and deceitful about the way transistors just die a
> silent death. And then there is all that solder and heat sink compound. It
> just ain't right .....
>
>
> ;-)
>
> Theo K4MO
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|