A weak comparison--Consider transients and reactance. Some weak comparison
with transients, but reactance??
73, Sam
>From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
>Reply-To: craxd1@verizon.net
>To: amps@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [Amps] Happy birthday to...
>Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:59:37 -0500
>
>Speaking of George, did you know that the same formulas for ohms law, are
>the same in hydraulics? The only difference is the terms are changed.
>Current = flow, and voltage = pressure. Resistance I'd say is still a
>resistance like placing a needle valve in line, or changing a pipe/hose
>size. I'm not sure what the term for resistance would be in hydraulics
>(restriction?) now since I've not done any of that in probably 7 years? I
>figure that George seen this in hydraulics, and converted it over to
>electricity when he seen they worked the same. Hydraulics formulas were out
>way before electrical. The US military used to teach electronics by using
>the water theory I think they called it. They compared how water acted
>being pumped through pipes as compared to a generator pushing electrons
>through a wire, tube = valve, etc..
>
>Best,
>
>Will
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 3/16/06 at 7:40 AM Bill Turner wrote:
>
> >George Ohm, born on this day in 1789, who made it possible for us to
> >get in the internet and argue over stuff. :-)
> >
> >73, Bill W6WRT
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Amps mailing list
> >Amps@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|