| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Proof of idiocy |
| From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:00 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 08:03 PM 3/13/2006, Will Matney wrote: >Anyhow, that would be a mess to get a dial to count correct for the >full mesh and unmesh. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** I see your point, but for me, if the dial stopped at 80 instead of 100, I could live with it. In spite of what my ex thinks, I am adaptable. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Proof of idiocy, Will Matney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] Threads - was idiocy - perhaps it still is, Roger Parsons |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Proof of idiocy, Will Matney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Proof of idiocy, Rich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |