Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>, HOWARDLYON@aol.com,amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:29:32 +0100 (CET)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Bill Turner said:

>Amp-derived ALC never works exactly like you want it to.<
I'm not that convinced that any ALC really does....it's usually implemented 
such that it's trying to close the door after the horse has bolted.
I suspect that to avoid that approach, the ALC needs to start kicking in at 
some power level below where you want it to hold the power. To get fast attack 
and not have the loop unstable or transients screwing things up, you need a 
balanced gain controlled amplifier (really a 4 quadrant multiplier) and a 
balanced control loop and it gets so messy  that I for one say "*&%8^@# it"  
and don't bother.........A bad ALC loop produces plenty of what Rich calls, 
politely, 'feculence'. I have a cruder name for it.......
73
Peter G3RZP (but not at home yet)
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>