Mike,
The Tek is a decent analog LCR meter. I've seen them for sell on eBay some.
Boonton stuff is good the same as the old Genrad and ESI meters. The major
problem though if you go back too far in manufacturing dates is the
availability of repair parts. Genrad, now Quadtech has some of the old parts
available for I believe the 1656 in the link. ESI now Tegam still has parts
back to the 251. I think Leader still may have parts for the 740, I'm not sure.
Some of these have precision wound resistors (oddball values with real
precision), and coils from the manufacturer themselves, and those are what's
hard to find a replacement. That's the reason I stay with somewhat newer models
of used test equipment. HP is really good but their repair parts prices makes
one cringe at the thought. There is a good bench style LCR meter now available
off eBay new for about $600 from Mastech I think which if I bought new would
probably buy.
Best,
Will
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 1/24/06 at 10:49 PM m.ford wrote:
>Gee, no mention of the Tektronics LC-130. I have a pair of them, one set
>up
>with a C jig and the other for L. We had an old Boonton with top terminals
>at work that was great for small coils wound under a microscope. Nice
>smooth
>metal plate under the terminals so you didn't have to sneak up on it to
>get a reading.
>
>Mike k1ern
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 9:42 PM
>Subject: Re: [Amps] measuring rf colis
>
>
>Conrad,
>
>I spoke to the designer of this LCR meter a while back about converting
>the kit to a bench meter and decided against it.
>The reason for me was that the components needed to be mounted as close to
>the test terminals as possible and it didn't
>use the shielded lead method. However, for a handheld LCR meter, he did a
>very good job and it's better than the B&K
>handhelds that were made in accuracy.
>
>I have three LCR meters here I use, a Leader LCR-740 analog type, a GenRad
>Digi-bridge 1657, and an ESI 251. The Leader
>is OK, but needs the components right at the terminals to be measured
>correctly. The GenRad is almost like it as it
>doesn't have the shilded leads per say, and you use clamp terminals on top
>of the meter. They do make a set of leads
>which plug into the terminal strip something similar to the digital
>Heathkit LCR meter. The ESI uses Bananna jacks but
>come into a shielded lead steup (Like some HP). I have actually had a low
>inductance tank coil in my hand while
>measuring it and squeezing the coil to change its inductance while
>watching on the ESI 251. It stays the same whether I
>was handling it or not which surprised the dickens out of me. I did a
>bunch of research on these when I started building
>up for a transformer and coil shop.
>
>Anyhow for the price, if I wanted to measure a few coils or caps here and
>there, the one you mention is a decent meter
>and there is some imports which aren't too shabby. Below is some links on
>eBay for a few.
>
>Leader LCR -740;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/LEADER-LCR-740-Inductance-Capacitance-Impedence-Bridge_W0QQitemZ7583877861QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>L/C Meter IIB Unbuilt kit (one in mention);
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/Inductance-Capacitance-meter-L-C-Meter-IIB-Unbuilt-kit_W0QQitemZ7584423880QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>BK Precision 875A;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/BK-Precision-875A-LCR-meter_W0QQitemZ7584290546QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>DIGITAL LCR;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/DIGITAL-LCR-METER-MULTIMETER-TEMPERATURE-NEW_W0QQitemZ7583602075QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>LCR Meter,Capacitance/Inductance, AC/DC V/A/R/Hz/T, NIB; (My favorite)
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/LCR-Meter-Capacitance-Inductance-AC-DC-V-A-R-Hz-T-NIB_W0QQitemZ7583295805QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>GenRad 1656;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/GR-1656-Impedance-Bridge_W0QQitemZ7582746915QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>ESI 250DE;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ESI-250DE-LCR-Bridge-Impedance-Capacitance-Inductance_W0QQitemZ7584146904QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
> ZM11/U Military;
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ZM11-U-CAPACITANCE-INDUCTANCE-RESISTANCE-BRIDGE-VINTAGE_W0QQitemZ7584725342QQcategoryZ25421QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
>Best,
>
>Will
>
>
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 1/25/06 at 2:15 AM Conrad_G0RUZ wrote:
>
>>Don't MFJ recommend putting a known value capacitor in parallel with the
>>coil and measuring the resonance? Then as you know the capacitors value ±
>>5%
>>and the MFJ frequency ± 5% you should be able to calculate the approximate
>>inductance of the coil for large inductors at lower frequencies at least.
>>Forget it in the VHF region though, stray C between turns become very
>>significant. I use an AADE LC Meter II and I am delighted with it, it
>comes
>>up with very accurate results on some lab standard inductors that we have
>>at
>>University. Here is a link
>>http://www.aade.com/lcmeter.htm
>>
>>73
>>
>>Conrad G0RUZ
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com
>>> [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Will Matney
>>> Sent: 25 January 2006 01:47
>>> To: amps@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [Amps] measuring rf colis
>>>
>>> Chuck,
>>>
>>> Most stock chokes are measured at frequencies around 1 and 10
>>> kHz using a precision LCR (bridge) meter. I have both the
>>> analog and digital bridges here and use both. There are some
>>> LCR meters by HP and a few others which can measure up to 10
>>> MHz. Most all stock coils though like Ohmite are measured at
>>> around 1 to 10 kHz. The three top manufacturers of LCR meters
>>> is HP, ESI, and GenRad.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Will
>>>
>>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>>
>>> On 1/24/06 at 7:51 PM Partain, Chuck wrote:
>>>
>>> >probably touched upon 10k times but..
>>> >
>>> >Using my MFJ-259b, measuring some rf coils I have here, sweep the
>>> >frequency...
>>> >all coils I have, move all over the place. Is there a standard
>>> >frequency these are rated at?
>>> >
>>> >say a coil is advertised at 10uh. at what frequency? I can
>>> pretty much
>>> >determine the current by the size of the wire...??
>>> >
>>> >chuck
>>> >_______________________________________________
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|