To: | "'Tom Cathey'" <K1JJ@comcast.net>, <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean |
From: | "Phil Clements" <philc@texascellnet.com> |
Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:51:17 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> "The MP Mark 5's are being closed out by XXX at $XXXX. [I deleted the X > info] The salesman, a DXer/contester said it is being discontinued. The > class A amp capability proved to be a negative. If you can believe this, > it > allowed others to "nustle" in too close to you if your IMD was that far > down > and make your RXing difficult if not impossible. You need some artifacts > to > hold others at bay!" Not a problem with this radio on CW....the key clicks keep everyone 2-3 khz away. (((73))) Phil Clements, k5PC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Tom Cathey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Effects of load Z mismatch?, Jim Kearman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Vic K2VCO |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Keith Dutson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |