To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean |
From: | W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net> |
Date: | Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:57:20 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
>A dirty transmitter station receives much better than a clean one!! > > > I just received an email from a buddy who is considering buying an > > FT-1000MP. They are being closed out and discontinued according to a > > salesman. > > > > Here's the salesman's comments about the class A stage. If you > can believe this, it > > allowed others to "nustle" in too close to you if your IMD was > that far down \Nus"tle|, v. t. [Cf. Nuzzle.] To fondle; to cherish. [Obs.] Brings a whole new meaning to crowded band conditions. "Lots of QRM, I'm going to QSY before I get fondled!" _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Steve Thompson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Vic K2VCO |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Gary Schafer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean, Steve Thompson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |