Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37

To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>, "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>,<amps@contesting.com>, "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37
From: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:36:30 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Most of the better commercial people are also hams...At least here in the
USA...Jim..
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>; "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>;
<amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37


>
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> At 06:46 AM 1/9/2006, k7fm wrote:
> >I can vouch for being near the one that is cleaner. The difference
> >is light night and day if you are close by.  I would much rather be
> >near an amp that exceeded the norm.
> >
> >Most amateur amps do not meet the commercial standard for distortion
> >products - which may be a recognition that we are "amateurs" and not
> >technically able to meet commercial standards.  Hooray for those
> >that do want a cleaner amp.
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Ok, makes sense. I'm not near any active hams, so I've never noticed
> what you have.
>
> I do take exception to the part about "not technically able...". Hams
> can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire,
> not ability.
>
> Bill, W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>