Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37

To: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>, "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>,<amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:12:48 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

At 06:46 AM 1/9/2006, k7fm wrote:
>I can vouch for being near the one that is cleaner. The difference 
>is light night and day if you are close by.  I would much rather be 
>near an amp that exceeded the norm.
>
>Most amateur amps do not meet the commercial standard for distortion 
>products - which may be a recognition that we are "amateurs" and not 
>technically able to meet commercial standards.  Hooray for those 
>that do want a cleaner amp.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ok, makes sense. I'm not near any active hams, so I've never noticed 
what you have.

I do take exception to the part about "not technically able...". Hams 
can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire, 
not ability.

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>