Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Plate choke resistance

To: "Angelo Karabetsos" <ve3yn@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Plate choke resistance
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 06:01:14 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
   Thinner wire allows more L per unit length, so the RFC takes up less 
space,  The reason that one can use thinner rather than thicker wire 
for a single-layer RFC is that since each turn is in contact with 
cooling air, the current capacity is increased.  For example, in HV RFC 
service, #22 Cu will carry 7A in SSB and CW service, whereas in xfmr 
service, it might be used to carry c. 1A.
-  Satisfactory types of insulation for HV RFC service are TFE or Type 
WL 180ºC silicone varnish insulated wire -- such as is used by electric 
motor rewinding shops.

On Aug 5, 2005, at 8:59 PM, Angelo Karabetsos wrote:

> Hello,
> I noticed that most plate chokes are wound with very thin gauge wire 
> and varying diameter. I assume that would make it quite 
> resistive/lossy. Some are split and mounted at right angles. Is there 
> an advantage to using a thin gauge conductor other than space 
> considerations?
> 73 VE3YN
>
> __
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>