To: | garyschafer@comcast.net, "R. Measures" <r@somis.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF |
From: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:19:37 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
I think the real issue is being missed there. The real test of non-linearity is the production of harmonic and intermodulation distortion. This means allows measurements of nonlinearity as small as a very small fraction of a percent. Even to a part per million with very specialized equipment. If there were nonlinear propagation the RF spectra would be unusable. The apparent increase in signal strength could be in perception. Which has to do with your reference. On receive, a signal to noise ratio of 0 db would be unintelligible but a 3 or 6 db increase in signal would provide lots of improvement. And are you measuring signal or signal+noise? It comes down to this. If no harmonics are produced and no intermodulation products produced between the transmitting and receiving sites the propagation path is linear. Now, if you should be unfortunate enough to have a thermonuclear blast between the transmitter and receiver you would have lots of nonlinearity. This is due to the greatly ionized region (large volume of plasma) due to the blast. This scrambles signals and presents all sorts of problems for those trying to use RF communications. If you want to do such an experiment arrange for two stations near by to transmit a KW signal and then look for the intermodulation products at the far end of the path. From that you can calculate the degree of nonlinearity. Don't use stations are close enough that there may be mutual coupling between their antennas and sending a 2 tone test will not work either because the degree of nonlinearity that you are looking for will be very very small. But don't forget. There is also nonlinearity in your receiver as well. But all of those sources of nonlinearity are small compared to the nonlinearity that would produce several db increase in receive signal strength over the change transmitter output power. 73 Bill wa4lav _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Hipersil, the myth and the truth. (Updated), G3rzp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF, Gary Schafer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, Gary Schafer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF, Gary Schafer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |