| To: | "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa | 
| From: | Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> | 
| Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net | 
| Date: | Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:26:42 -0400 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> | 
| R.Measures wrote: > On Apr 17, 2005, at 2:38 AM, G3rzp@aol.com wrote: > > >>But what is the resolution of the S meter? > > > With the AGC off, and the RF gain backed down, there's plenty. The > step-attenuator method is the gold standard. With the AGC off, how does your S meter function at all? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, G3rzp | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] article in Nature, modified Aurora via HF tspa, R . Measures | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |