What I can,t figure is why one would want to run a tetrode in G-G where
a triode is the very ticket for it? To me, if one wanted to run a
tetrode, they would want to run it the way it was designed to run in
the first place. This being knowing from the get go that screen and
bias was a must. To me, those extra prower supplies aren't that big of
a hassle and neither is the expense. Believe you me, I don't have boo-
koos of money either. To me, if I wanted a simple G-G amp, I'd use
nothing but a triode. Of course that's just my opinion on the subject,
others may have one that I dont see.
Will
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:36:56 -0500, Bob Maser <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
wrote:
Being a proponent of the KISS philosophy, IMHO, it would seem
appropriate to decide how much output one wants, how much drive power
is available, and then pick the tube(s) that will satisfy the
requirement. A 4-1000A requires too much drive unless you're running
really high voltage whereas a 3-1000Z will do the job with less
components and only needs ±3500VDC to drive it up the and beyond the
legal limit using only 100W of drive. If the RF deck is built with
heavy duty components, one could always do a tube swap to bigger and
better with few changes. A deck that would accommodate a 3CX3000A7
down the road comes to mind.
Remember, too much power is just enough!
Bob W6TR _______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
__________ NOD32 1.880 (20040928) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.nod32.com
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|