To: | Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] RE: 4CX250B Screen Supplies |
From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2004 04:24:58 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Jul 23, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Will Matney wrote: What Rich says is exactly right! The voice can range anywhere in the audio spectrum and thus makes the screen current swing widely. The two tone test only uses two of the spectrums frequencies and is a constant value. Thus, the screen current will be constant and proportional to the two incoming tones. Like he mentioned, it wouldn't matter if it was regulated or not because it would be set for only those two tones. ... Hi, Will -- If the screen-PS current was constant, the screen-V must have been constant whether the PS was regulated or not even. So why did the advertised two-tone tests show reduced IMD when one type of screen regulator was used? Rich, AG6K _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] RE: 4CX250B Screen Supplies, R . Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] RE: 4CX250B Screen Supplies, Steve Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] RE: 4CX250B Screen Supplies, Will Matney |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] RE: 4CX250B Screen Supplies, Will Matney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |