Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] 3CX1500D7 VS 3CX1500A7

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] 3CX1500D7 VS 3CX1500A7
From: dajs@accnorwalk.com
Reply-to: dajs@accnorwalk.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:25:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Compare the specs for the new 3CX1500D7 vs the 3CX1200Z. It appears that it is
a very similar tube with bigger cooler and
filament designed to replace 3-500Z's. Downside is lower max frequency and 
greater
drive requirements. It may suffer ffrom lower output at 30 MHZ like the 
3CX1200A7.


In my opinion, the 3CX1500A7/8877 is a better tube for homebrew and new 
applications.
Lower drive requirements from the exciter mean lower IMD, potential greater
efficiency at 30 MHZ, and much lower filament power requirements.

Dennis W0JX

This message was written using Web Email from ACC http://www.accnorwalk.com
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>