>
>Amen , Rich: remember the "power mics." that cber's used many years ago????
>(and maybe still do?? ) carl/ kz5ca
/\ Yes. I doubt that the malpractice has stopped, Carl. BTW - faux
pas instead of "fax pas".
cheers
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "2" <2@vc.net>
>To: "Peter Chadwick" <Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com>; "AMPS"
><amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:50 AM
>Subject: RE: [AMPS] FT100D driving Alpha 87a
>
>
>>
>> >
>> >Despite the various widely differing opinions on many amplifier subjects
>> >discussed here, there seems to be a general consensus that ALC is not
>always
>> >totally wholly desirable, and can actually be a very bad thing.
>> >
>> >Not many topics can manage that here.
>> >
>> /\ One of the intrinsic problems with ALC is overshoot. This problem
>> is exacerbated by using too much microphone gain. Hams criticise CBers
>> for this fax pas - but there are some Hams who do the same thing. Mo'
>> ALC is not mo' betta
>> >
>> cheers, Peter
>>
>> - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>> end
>>
>>
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|