Yeah, I have no problem with what you are saying, but what Bill said about
the audio industry inventing RMS has weight in that area. However, I used
the term RMS power before the big audio boom started--back in 1957 and when
we novices were being taught by the older hams, the term was very much in
use. W6UGA--John Klingman of Manteca, Ca. (SK) was a very well known ham
and K6BP Ray Fulton, also of Manteca, (SK) wrote articles for a number of
the respected ham magazines. They both used the term RMS power on a regular
basis.
Ok, Bill, I know the standard way to derive RMS voltage. You take the square
root of the sum of the squares of the individual voltages of each of the 360
degrees of the sine-wave. Now please show me how that is used in the power
formula, as you mentioned, to come up with average power. I am all for
learning something in my old age.
Billy
>From: "Mike" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
>Reply-To: "Mike" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] RMS Power
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:44:38 -0700
>
>Hi Bill,
>
>Isn't the RMS Power rating of an audio amp much lower than its
>peak output capability? When I was in high school drooling over
>high-end stereo amps, I recall magazines like Stereo Review would
>rate audio amplifiers in terms of their peak output capability
>as well as RMS output. The really good amps were capable of
>deliverying something like 3 or 4 times their RMS rating on music
>peaks without clipping. I think they used the term "dynamic
>headroom" when comparing RMS to peak output capability.
>
>Mike, W4EF............................................
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: William Fuqua
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:49 AM
> Subject: Fwd: [AMPS] RMS Power
>
>
> There is no mathematical notation for "RMS POWER".
> If you calculate voltage from average power and load resistance you get
>RMS volts.
> Like wise if you calculate current from average power you get RMS amps.
> Look at the definition of RMS voltage or current. Put it into
>the equation for
> Power. What you get is the formula for Average Power!!!!!
> This RMS power stuff started in the 60's with the stereo equipment
>manufacturers.
> They invented "RMS Music Power". This is equivalent to PEP, low% duty
>cycle power.
> It allowed them to come up with large wattage ratings for short burst of
>audio. This was necessary
> due to the fact that their equipment had weak power supplies and low
>power dissipation capability.
>
> RMS power is a meaningless term.
>
>
> 73
> Bill wa4lav
>
>
>
>
>
>
> X-Originating-IP: [12.41.226.194]
> From: "Billy Ward" <billydeanward@hotmail.com>
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [AMPS] RMS Power
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:32:16 -0000
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2001 05:32:16.0893 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[B175B2D0:01C0FF93]
> Sender: owner-amps@contesting.com
> X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
>
>
> [WC6W]
> The Bird 43 (without a peak reading module) is an average reading
> meter.
>
> [Billy]
> I thought that the Bird 43 was an RMS meter without the peak reading
>module. RMS and average are not the same?
>
> Billy
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|