Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Power Handling Capability of Coax Cable

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Power Handling Capability of Coax Cable
From: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:11:36 EDT
In a message dated 5/4/00 11:41:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
jono@enteract.com writes:

> 
>  
>  on 5/4/00 10:09 AM, measures at 2@vc.net wrote:
>  
>  > I have never seen such a thing.  The big variable is duty-cycle.  For
>  > example, RG-213/u typically runs comfortably warm with 15k on 14MHz using
>  > unprocessed SSB-Voice. However, switch to RTTY, and 15k makes it run way
>  > too hot. 
>  
>  I agree with you on this, Rich.  Sure there is a "maximum power handling"
>  capability and that may be specified usually as a CW rating.  IMHO, one of
>  the real numbers you need to look for is voltage breakdown in the
>  dielectric.
>  
>  73,
>  
>  Jon
>  NA9D
>  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Running maximum legal input power and assuming ~ 750 Watts key down output, 
the "real numbers" you need to look at for voltage breakdwon in the 
dielectric is....194 Volts (assuming a 50 ohm system). Not much danger I 
would say as I conduct 4,000 volts over a RG-59U coax cable from my power 
supply.

My application is a 12" run of coax from the output of my Pi-L tank to the 
vacuum antenna relay which could handle at least 1500 watts out, key down.

I was amazed at the number of responses to my initial query telling me that 
these figures were contained in every ARRL handbook.  I have yet to find 
POWER handling capacity in any ARRL handbook.  Thank you to all who responded 
with sources of this information....I now have it.

Dave, WT8R

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>