Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] FCC Actions at Dayton

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] FCC Actions at Dayton
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 20:12:45 -0700


>
>Rich wrote:
>
>Subject:               Re: [AMPS] FCC Actions at Dayton
>Date sent:             Sat, 22 May 1999 08:49:45 -0700
>From:                  Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>To:                    "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk>, 
><amps@contesting.com>
>
>> ?  One workaround is to sell parts kits from two sources.  Neither parts
>> kit can be used to build an amplifier.   The assembly instructions would
>> be available from a third party. 

> > >The rules are very detailed >and they
> > >seem to cover all possible dodges to modify an existing amp for >CB use, 
>
>Won't work if the FCC finds out. 
>
>I specifically asked the FCC about this when we wanted to build a 
>50 watt amplifier kit for QRP transmitters. I offered to:
>
>1.) Use FET's that would not operate above 15 MHz.
>
>2.) Not include major components of the FCC's choice.
>
>3.) Not include or have available instructions.
>
>The answer was always no. 
>
? Don't ask.  .  Supplying all of the parts from one business name and 
location is an invitation for a FCC investigation.  .  . 
.

-  cheers, Tom


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>