Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Henry 2K2

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Henry 2K2
From: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 20:47:04 +0100
Picking up on one of Rich's remarks:

>Henry's glitch-R in the neg. HV 
>lead is a mistake.   A glitch R should be added to the pos. HV circuit.  

It doesn't really matter which end of the HV circuit the glitch resistor
and HV fuse are - unless the designer thinks that putting them in the
negative return rail requires less insulation. In fact it requires
*more* insulation, because a "crowbar" short from HV+ to chassis will
tend to push the return rail down to *minus* the normal HV. 

To avoid breakdown, the negative rail and the negative end of the
capacitor stack therefore need to be insulated to the same standard as
the positive end.

A certain line of amplifiers has the fuse in the return rail, with
ordinary hookup wire running back to the capacitors through a hole in
the chassis - not even a grommet.

73 from Ian G3SEK          Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
                          'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
                           http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>