On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:41:38 -0600 Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com> writes:
>
>>I think John's point is that higher max. operating temperature rating
>seems
>>to automatically imply some other performance enhancements over an 85
>C
>>rated cap, and I can't see that it does.
>
>Phil, I think John said the opposite (at least how I read it). That
>is,
>the 105C caps have less performance than the 85C caps. That would
>only
>make sense.
Explain why? Instead of rhetoric please use documented spec sheets for
instance.
Something always has to give when you improve a
>particular
>spec.
OH ???
I've got people asking me all the time for specs that are
>nearly
>physically impossible on parts I sell. I tell them "something has to
>
>give!"
Only in a static or degenerating product Jon.
73 Carl KM1H
>
>73,
>
>Jon
>KE9NA
>
>
>-------------------------------------
>Jon Ogden
>KE9NA
>
>http://www.qsl.net/ke9na <--- CHECK IT OUT! It's been
>updated!!!!!
>
>
>"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|