Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] ARRL and QST (and CW Relevance)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] ARRL and QST (and CW Relevance)
From: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:03:46 EST
In a message dated 1/28/99 1:09:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
andywallace@home.com writes:

<< 
 This, I guess, is why the Coast Guard, the military, and ships at sea have
all
 dropped CW as being inefficient and archaic.
 
 Andy  K5VM >>

All the above entities are not known for being significantly bright, wise,
effective or efficient. Just look what they are doing with our taxes. Not the
best example or reason to follow. 

Yuri   -.-   ...--   -...   ..-  (so government can't identify me  :-)

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>