| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" |
| From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:17:53 -0000 |
>Just because you are
>transmitting a lot of bits in your sense doesn't mean you are
communicating a
>lot of intelligence.
You only need to turn on the TV set to see the truth of that!
I count a dot or a space (equal length to a dot) as one bit.
The standard word to use for calculating speed is PARIS, which counts as 46
bits.
73
Peter G3RZP.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, Rich Measures |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, John Fielding |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code" and "bounced" submission to [CW] from Bob Marston, K1TA [LONG] but please read all, Rich Measures |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: SERIOUS commentary from N4XY on "no-code", Michael Tope |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |