At 11:30 AM -0700 7/29/97, Anthony R. Gold wrote:
>In message <19970729142726.AAD17368@[205.231.11.88]> Rich Measures writes:
>> >In message <19970722032009.AAA7862@[205.231.11.81]> Rich Measures writes:
>> >
>> >> The legal limit on splatter inside a ham band is essentially that the
>> >> splatter can not extend outside the ham band.
>
>> Part 97 is not the law of the land. Part 97 is a set of arbitrary rules
>> that were established by the FCC. IMO, the amateur radio rules were
>> written vaguely to make enforcement as easy as possible for the FCC.
>
>These two postings create a paradox. In view of the `fact' that Part
>97 is not the law, how does one learn where the band edges actually
>are in order to keep the splatter contained within them :-)
I'm confused, too. "Legal" requires a "law" defining what is legal. If
Part 97 isn't that law, what is?? %(
73, Dick
--
Dick Flanagan W6OLD CFII Minden, Nevada
Visit http://www.delphi.com/electronic/
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|