To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] re:4-250A |
From: | wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene) |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:03:02 -0700 |
At 07:30 PM 7/29/97 BST, you wrote: > >These two postings create a paradox. In view of the `fact' that Part >97 is not the law, how does one learn where the band edges actually >are in order to keep the splatter contained within them :-) >----- Tony..in the United States a regulation or rule issued by an authority or commission to which our Congress has delegated such authority IS ithe law of the land until or unless a Federal Court decides that (a) the issuing authority exceeded its power or (b) the regulation or rule is inconsistent with the statute. In this case, a court would have to find that Part 97 was beyond the powers of the FCC to issue or that the provisions of Part 97 being challenged violate the Communications Acts passed by Congress. Part 97 is the law of the land, even in W6 land. 73 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] re:4-250A, Anthony R. Gold |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] re:4-250A, Dick Flanagan |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] re:4-250A, Anthony R. Gold |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] re:4-250A, Dick Flanagan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |