George,
Why is this an off-topic question? It there is some setting in WL, or
advice from other M/2 WL user that can help Jerry, then this is the place,
isn't it? I would expect to see a respons saying, "Yup, that how it works,
and the scoring people sort out whether the log is M/2 or M/M", or, "You
didn't set the mulble-mumble ini file option..." or something.
Anyway, as a WL user, I would like to know the answer...
Brian, N1IK
-----Original Message-----
From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Georgek5kg@aol.com
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:41 AM
To: k0tv@arrl.net
Cc: writelog@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Multi-two cabrillo file
In a message dated 11/1/2004 5:52:01 AM Mountain Standard Time,
k0tv@adelphia.net writes:
Hello all,
I ran M/2 last weekend using WL 10.50 and TCPIP networking.
I ran four stations, but didn't violate the M/2 rules. When changing bands,
we went to a new station most of the time. The Cabrillo file lists
transmitter 0, 1, 2, and 3. This is the first time I had four stations set
up. In previous contests, we used only two stations.
My question, will the folks at CQ correctly figure out that this is a M/2
entry and not M/M? Do I have to go in and edit the Cabrillo file to show
the band changes?
73, Jerry K0TV
Jerry,
I think that your question is more appropriate for the CQ-Contest reflector
than the WriteLog reflector. I don't view this as a WL issue. Perhaps you
should send your question directly to the CQWW contest committee.
73, George, k5kg/7
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|