Randy, thanks...I can breathe a bit better now!
Is there a solution, or rather, is a need for one? For you guys who run
high rates (I'm a very little pistol, believe me), it could be
trouble...
...which begs the next two questions...if the CQWW Committee "the CQ WW
Committee only cares that the band is logged correctly. They do not
look at the frequencies during the checking
process," then why is it in the Cabrillo format, and does the ARRL feel
the same when checking its logs?
As you can imagine, this could be a big issue, if a US station
*appears* to be operating out of band.
Eric W3DQ
I At 02:48 10/30/2000 +0000, Randy Thompson, K5ZD wrote:
>There are two answers to your question.
>
>1. For the contest log. The CQ WW Committee only cares that the band
>is
>logged correctly. They do not look at the frequencies during the
>checking
>process.
>
>2. For your log. WriteLog saves the frequency that it gets from
>polling the
>radio at the time you hit the enter key for the QSO. I too have
>noticed
>that sometimes it gets the tx freq, and other times the rx
>frequency. Not a
>big deal for me (although it does make it look like you were working
>people
>below 7100!).
>
>Randy, K5ZD
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-writelog@contesting.com
> > [mailto:owner-writelog@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Eric Rosenberg
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 2:09 AM
> > To: writelog@contesting.com
> > Subject: [WriteLog] Correctly Recording Splits w/v10.19a
> >
> > I just finished using version 10.19a in the CQWW contest. All went
> > well, and I was pleased.
> >
> > What I did notice is that some of the (few) QSO's that I made using
> > split frequencies were incorrectly logged.
> >
--
WWW: http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions: writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-writelog@contesting.com
|