VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] WTB: K6KWQ Amps

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] WTB: K6KWQ Amps
From: Edward <navydude1962@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:18:32 +0300
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Need his for 222 and 1.2.  

Thanks,
Ed NI6S 

> On Feb 15, 2014, at 23:05, vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Send VHFcontesting mailing list submissions to
>    vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    vhfcontesting-request@contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    vhfcontesting-owner@contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of VHFcontesting digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (Bob Burns W9BU)
>   2. Re: Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (Dan Evans)
>   3. Re: Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (Jerry)
>   4. Re: Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (Zack Widup)
>   5. Trends (Gregg Seidl)
>   6. Re: Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (John Geiger)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:40:45 -0500
> From: Bob Burns W9BU <w9bu_lists@rlburns.net>
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> Message-ID: <52FFA69D.6020609@rlburns.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
>> On 2/15/2014 11:50 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
>> Maybe most of the hams that are active just want radios they can take
>> out of a box, plug in and use.
> 
> So, buy an Alinco DR-235T FM mobile radio and at least get on 222 MHz 
> FM. There are also cheap, Chinese radios that will do 222 FM.
> 
> Yeah, FM is not as sexy as doing 222 CW or SSB. But, at least, it 
> generates activity on the band and there's nothing stopping folks from 
> making contest contacts on FM.
> 
> I haven't read all of the posts on this topic, but the harsh reality is 
> that of the 700,000 plus licensed hams in the U.S., only a small number 
> of them have any interest in VHF-UHF contesting. I think the ARRL may be 
> swayed by their survey results that tell them most of their members are 
> interested in HF, not VHF-UHF. So, they have to make a business 
> decision--do they put time, money, and resources into promoting 
> something their members don't care about or do they put that same time, 
> money, and resources into things their members want?
> 
> That leaves it to some other group to promote VHF-UHF contesting. And, 
> that would be a major undertaking.
> 
> Bob...
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:06:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Evans <k9zf@yahoo.com>
> To: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>,    VHF Contesting Reflector
>    <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> Message-ID:
>    <1392487581.44738.YahooMailNeo@web141606.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> I believe Zack is right. ?Most hams are afraid of anything less than plug and 
> play. ?So they are not willing to invest in a transverter that they think 
> would be too complicated to operate...
> 
> And yes, you and I know that modern transverters are not that difficult to 
> get on the air. ?But, do the "other guys" know that?
> 
> I still think advertising is the key. ?Some experienced ops answering 
> questions in the forums will help (I've posted a few times). ?But I would 
> like to see some articles about station building and operating by some 
> experienced ops. ?Articles in QST and CQ are great, Eham.net is a great place 
> as well. ?And lets face it, Eham will publish just about anything, hi hi.
> 
> For example, how about a couple of short articles on buying a modern 222 
> transverter, how to hook it up and get on the air with it. ?And maybe ?what 
> you did with it when it was up and running... ??
> 
> 73
> Dan
> ?
> -- 
> K9ZF
> Amateur Radio Emergency Service, Clark County Indiana. EM78el
> former K9ZF /R no budget Rover ***QRP-l #1269
> Check out the Rover Resource Page at:
> <http://www.qsl.net/n9rla>
> List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham-books
> Ask me how to join the Indiana Ham Mailing list!
> 
> 
> 
> On Saturday, February 15, 2014 12:15 PM, Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Maybe most of the hams that are active just want radios they can take
>> out of a box, plug in and use. I don't think that's true for
>> contesters - it requires a lot of work to build even a small contest
>> station.
>> 
>> I've always been a builder. My VHF+ station consists entirely of
>> transverters. I built all of them. I also built all the antennas I'm
>> using. But even if you bought a transverter from Down East Microwave
>> or somewhere, maybe it is just too much for the typical ham to figure
>> out how to interface it. I'd like to think that's not true.
>> 
>> I built the 222 MHz transverter designed by Zack Lau W1VT. I believe
>> it appeared in QEX magazine in 1993. You can find templates for the pc
>> boards at the ARRL site. I made my own boards. This transverter is a
>> great performer.
>> 
>> W1GHZ also sells boards for a small 222 MHz transverter designed to
>> work with the FT-817. It should work with any transceiver if you
>> connect it properly.
>> 
>> Again, maybe that's just too much work for most people.
>> :-(
>> 
>> In contests in this area, all the VHF contesters who have more than
>> one band seem to have 222. I usually work almost as many people on 222
>> as I do on 432 in contests.
>> 
>> 73, Zack W9SZ
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2/15/14, Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> On Wed, 2/12/14, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> "You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!? I, for one, am not interested in
>>> being belted *or* flayed.? But yes, that would surely be helpful if for no
>>> other reason than to make sure there is more than one point of view
>>> represented."
>>> 
>>> Based on my experiences of trying to do just that for more than 10 years now
>>> on places like eHam is that you will find more than likely to be simply
>>> "unheard" than be criticized for posting information about what we do on the
>>> "ultra highs". But yes, please do chime in, it gets pretty lonely out there
>>> trying to offer information to the masses about what we do on these bands.
>>> 
>>> There was a recent eHam.net article ("222 MHz the missing Band - Still
>>> Missing") posted by W4KYR asking why after 10 years after someone had posted
>>> that same question in a previous article that there are still no all band,
>>> all mode, radios with 222 in them from I, K, Y, or even anyone else. The
>>> responses were interesting. Several of us pointed out that there are a
>>> couple readily available off the shelf transverter options to get going on
>>> 222 SSB/CW. And I further pointed out that for fixed station uses where
>>> portability isn't important transverters are a better way to go anyhow. That
>>> was basically the exact same comment I made 10 years previously to the
>>> article cited by this most recent one.
>>> 
>>> Then there were numerous comments that conflated FM only gear availability
>>> with the topic of the article that was specifically about SSB/CW capability.
>>> But then also many of the posters to that article were so completely fixated
>>> on the notion that only legitimate way to get on on a band is to buy it in a
>>> box from I, K, or Y they simply couldn't (refused to??) comprehend that
>>> there are others ways to get onto 222. There's this really peculiar
>>> perception out there that if it isn't available from I, K, or Y, then it
>>> doesn't exist. And that it won't exist until it can be bought from I, K, or
>>> Y.. This widely held belief out there in amateur radio land has baffled me
>>> almost more than the reality of there being 10's of thousands of radios with
>>> 6m, 2m, and 70cm in them already out there in people's hands that never get
>>> used on those bands and modes.
>>> 
>>> So I will continue assert that it is not equipment availability, or
>>> availability of information about what we do that is the limiting factor for
>>> why people don't get on these bands and modes we do, it is something else.
>>> 
>>> Duane
>>> N9DG
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:31:08 -0700
> From: Jerry <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>
> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> Message-ID: <52FFB26C.2040809@shaw.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> I had several locals..telling me 'I was Loco' for monitoring 6M all the 
> time I am in the shack (stand alone 6M stn)  I convinced a group of them 
> to try 6M after the local 2M FM Net on the clubs Repeater one evening ! 
> Many comments were "Wow..I have never heard a signal on this Band 
> before..and I have owned this Rig for many, many years" !  I gave them a 
> couple /B freq. to put into memory.."Have a look every once in 
> awhile..maybe you will hear the band is open" ! Then.. every once in 
> awhile, one will tell me they 'Do Hear the /B off and On" ! So when I 
> tell them that is MS pings they are hearing.. "What is That" is the 
> Reply ! So.. many of us OT'rs are probably Guilty of 'Not Sharing Info' 
> often enough..and many more are still the 'Plug and Play HF, FM Utility 
> Op's that any interested young ones can't get a reasonable explanation 
> of anything 'New' (well..to them !) Most of the 'Seasoned Vets' I will 
> call them, locally..it's '2M is for FM, HF is the AM 40M Gang..then the 
> 80M evening Traffic Net...and 10, 15, 20M for DX..(or chatting with your 
> friend across the Country 'Every Day' about the same things ! )  I had a 
> small group in the shack one time..showing them what WSJT can do for MS 
> and EME.  They were All impressed..but afterwards..they stated that 
> 'None of them Owned a PC at home' to use it !   I am sure they still 
> 'turn that Big Knob to change the channels on the TV as well' ! :o)
> You should have heard the 'Uproar on FM when I mentioned I have 300W on 
> 2M' !
> Going to be a 'Slow Growing Process'..not sure if there is any 'quick 
> fixes' !
> Jerry
> VE6CPP
>> On 2/15/2014 11:06 AM, Dan Evans wrote:
>> I believe Zack is right.  Most hams are afraid of anything less than plug 
>> and play.  So they are not willing to invest in a transverter that they 
>> think would be too complicated to operate...
>> 
>> And yes, you and I know that modern transverters are not that difficult to 
>> get on the air.  But, do the "other guys" know that?
>> 
>> I still think advertising is the key.  Some experienced ops answering 
>> questions in the forums will help (I've posted a few times).  But I would 
>> like to see some articles about station building and operating by some 
>> experienced ops.  Articles in QST and CQ are great, Eham.net is a great 
>> place as well.  And lets face it, Eham will publish just about anything, hi 
>> hi.
>> 
>> For example, how about a couple of short articles on buying a modern 222 
>> transverter, how to hook it up and get on the air with it.  And maybe  what 
>> you did with it when it was up and running...
>> 
>> 73
>> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:07:51 -0600
> From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
> To: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> Message-ID:
>    <CANJxhWgLHO2U=uFGFw-g9PHX1vmE7Q=bV8zFWquOm7xoW615ew@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> I have an SDR receiver (Softrock VHF Ensemble II receiver) that I
> leave displaying the beacon band on 6m. When beacons pop up, it's very
> evident on the waterfall display. At least then I know there's some
> sort of band opening and to where.
> 
> Modern technology amazes me. I never dreamed of some of this stuff 30
> years ago. But it's great to have now!
> 
> 73, Zack W9SZ
> 
> 
>> On 2/15/14, Jerry <jer.sieg@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> I had several locals..telling me 'I was Loco' for monitoring 6M all the
>> time I am in the shack (stand alone 6M stn)  I convinced a group of them
>> to try 6M after the local 2M FM Net on the clubs Repeater one evening !
>> Many comments were "Wow..I have never heard a signal on this Band
>> before..and I have owned this Rig for many, many years" !  I gave them a
>> couple /B freq. to put into memory.."Have a look every once in
>> awhile..maybe you will hear the band is open" ! Then.. every once in
>> awhile, one will tell me they 'Do Hear the /B off and On" ! So when I
>> tell them that is MS pings they are hearing.. "What is That" is the
>> Reply ! So.. many of us OT'rs are probably Guilty of 'Not Sharing Info'
>> often enough..and many more are still the 'Plug and Play HF, FM Utility
>> Op's that any interested young ones can't get a reasonable explanation
>> of anything 'New' (well..to them !) Most of the 'Seasoned Vets' I will
>> call them, locally..it's '2M is for FM, HF is the AM 40M Gang..then the
>> 80M evening Traffic Net...and 10, 15, 20M for DX..(or chatting with your
>> friend across the Country 'Every Day' about the same things ! )  I had a
>> small group in the shack one time..showing them what WSJT can do for MS
>> and EME.  They were All impressed..but afterwards..they stated that
>> 'None of them Owned a PC at home' to use it !   I am sure they still
>> 'turn that Big Knob to change the channels on the TV as well' ! :o)
>> You should have heard the 'Uproar on FM when I mentioned I have 300W on
>> 2M' !
>> Going to be a 'Slow Growing Process'..not sure if there is any 'quick
>> fixes' !
>> Jerry
>> VE6CPP
>>> On 2/15/2014 11:06 AM, Dan Evans wrote:
>>> I believe Zack is right.  Most hams are afraid of anything less than plug
>>> and play.  So they are not willing to invest in a transverter that they
>>> think would be too complicated to operate...
>>> 
>>> And yes, you and I know that modern transverters are not that difficult to
>>> get on the air.  But, do the "other guys" know that?
>>> 
>>> I still think advertising is the key.  Some experienced ops answering
>>> questions in the forums will help (I've posted a few times).  But I would
>>> like to see some articles about station building and operating by some
>>> experienced ops.  Articles in QST and CQ are great, Eham.net is a great
>>> place as well.  And lets face it, Eham will publish just about anything,
>>> hi hi.
>>> 
>>> For example, how about a couple of short articles on buying a modern 222
>>> transverter, how to hook it up and get on the air with it.  And maybe
>>> what you did with it when it was up and running...
>>> 
>>> 73
>>> Dan
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:05:08 -0600
> From: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>
> To: <VHFcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: [VHFcontesting] Trends
> Message-ID: <BABCA0319C384550ADED4D1B6A739C19@GreggSeidlPC>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="utf-8"
> 
> I think we may be missing the key ingredient to lack of activity on some of 
> the VHF and UHF bands. I read a comment from one respondent that ? I built 
> all my xverters? . That is great and if someone enjoys that that?s even 
> better. Most hams have to work 40-50 hours a week and then there are the kids 
> activities and the honey-do list and, well I think we get the point. I just 
> think most hams don?t have the time to do that stuff,if they can?t plug it in 
> and get it to work on a weekend they just won?t do it. Most hams I know of 
> have several hobbies and radio is just one of them. I know I have a bunch of 
> things I enjoy so I have to ?pick what I like best? in radio and go with 
> that. There was a time when working most of the VHF and UHF bands was what I 
> enjoyed the most but as activity on those bands dwindled I found myself 
> wanting to work people so I gradually got off the VHF and UHF  bands. I even 
> sold my 2 meter gear and have no interest in getting back on them. However 6 
> meter
  a
> ctivity is growing and I plan on getting on 6 EME because there is activity 
> there and its my ?next? thing. I think HF is most hams constant activity and 
> the HF ham bands are full of activity.
> I don?t mean to sound doom and gloom but all hobbies ebb and flow with active 
> participants.Our local astronomy club rode the technology high when computer 
> aided scopes made it ?easy? to find all kinds of objects but now the newness 
> has worn off and some of those astronomers have drifted away, some have 
> stayed too. Same for our homebrew club. 
> 
> Gregg K9KL
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 20:05:25 -0000
> From: "John Geiger" <af5cc@fidmail.com>
> To: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>,    "VHF Contesting Reflector"
>    <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> Message-ID: <E6F0FD613CEC4310BCB403EF60B7B449@acer61a4596bd3>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>    reply-type=original
> 
> One common thread that kept running through that article on eham as well was 
> how easy it would be for manufactures to add 222 to these HF/VHF/UHF radio, 
> showing pretty much a lack of understanding to rig design.  They seem to 
> think that adding 222 would pretty much be removing a diode like you would 
> do for the MARS mod.  The idea that the manufactures have done marketing 
> research to determine that adding 222mhz isn't cost effective completely 
> escaped them.
> 
> Probably 80% of the hams with a HF/VHF/UHF rig have probably never used it 
> on 2m SSB or 70cm SSB.  Why in the world would they use it on 222mhz if they 
> won't even use it on those other bands?
> 
> 73 John AF5CC
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
> To: "VHF Contesting Reflector" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating
> 
> 
>> Maybe most of the hams that are active just want radios they can take
>> out of a box, plug in and use. I don't think that's true for
>> contesters - it requires a lot of work to build even a small contest
>> station.
>> 
>> I've always been a builder. My VHF+ station consists entirely of
>> transverters. I built all of them. I also built all the antennas I'm
>> using. But even if you bought a transverter from Down East Microwave
>> or somewhere, maybe it is just too much for the typical ham to figure
>> out how to interface it. I'd like to think that's not true.
>> 
>> I built the 222 MHz transverter designed by Zack Lau W1VT. I believe
>> it appeared in QEX magazine in 1993. You can find templates for the pc
>> boards at the ARRL site. I made my own boards. This transverter is a
>> great performer.
>> 
>> W1GHZ also sells boards for a small 222 MHz transverter designed to
>> work with the FT-817. It should work with any transceiver if you
>> connect it properly.
>> 
>> Again, maybe that's just too much work for most people.
>> :-(
>> 
>> In contests in this area, all the VHF contesters who have more than
>> one band seem to have 222. I usually work almost as many people on 222
>> as I do on 432 in contests.
>> 
>> 73, Zack W9SZ
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2/15/14, Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> On Wed, 2/12/14, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> "You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!  I, for one, am not interested 
>>> in
>>> being belted *or* flayed.  But yes, that would surely be helpful if for 
>>> no
>>> other reason than to make sure there is more than one point of view
>>> represented."
>>> 
>>> Based on my experiences of trying to do just that for more than 10 years 
>>> now
>>> on places like eHam is that you will find more than likely to be simply
>>> "unheard" than be criticized for posting information about what we do on 
>>> the
>>> "ultra highs". But yes, please do chime in, it gets pretty lonely out 
>>> there
>>> trying to offer information to the masses about what we do on these 
>>> bands.
>>> 
>>> There was a recent eHam.net article ("222 MHz the missing Band - Still
>>> Missing") posted by W4KYR asking why after 10 years after someone had 
>>> posted
>>> that same question in a previous article that there are still no all 
>>> band,
>>> all mode, radios with 222 in them from I, K, Y, or even anyone else. The
>>> responses were interesting. Several of us pointed out that there are a
>>> couple readily available off the shelf transverter options to get going 
>>> on
>>> 222 SSB/CW. And I further pointed out that for fixed station uses where
>>> portability isn't important transverters are a better way to go anyhow. 
>>> That
>>> was basically the exact same comment I made 10 years previously to the
>>> article cited by this most recent one.
>>> 
>>> Then there were numerous comments that conflated FM only gear 
>>> availability
>>> with the topic of the article that was specifically about SSB/CW 
>>> capability.
>>> But then also many of the posters to that article were so completely 
>>> fixated
>>> on the notion that only legitimate way to get on on a band is to buy it 
>>> in a
>>> box from I, K, or Y they simply couldn't (refused to??) comprehend that
>>> there are others ways to get onto 222. There's this really peculiar
>>> perception out there that if it isn't available from I, K, or Y, then it
>>> doesn't exist. And that it won't exist until it can be bought from I, K, 
>>> or
>>> Y.. This widely held belief out there in amateur radio land has baffled 
>>> me
>>> almost more than the reality of there being 10's of thousands of radios 
>>> with
>>> 6m, 2m, and 70cm in them already out there in people's hands that never 
>>> get
>>> used on those bands and modes.
>>> 
>>> So I will continue assert that it is not equipment availability, or
>>> availability of information about what we do that is the limiting factor 
>>> for
>>> why people don't get on these bands and modes we do, it is something 
>>> else.
>>> 
>>> Duane
>>> N9DG
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 134, Issue 19
> **********************************************
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VHFcontesting] WTB: K6KWQ Amps, Edward <=