VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] 2 meters

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 2 meters
From: "Jeffrey Guenther" <JeffJGuenther@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:09:29 -0500
List-post: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com">mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Herb,

Here's my two. I believe all the bands plans should be similar. Obviously, VHF activity is not what HF is, so some changes are understandable. I operate 6 and 2 meters CW from time to time and during contests. Not a big operator, but find it better for my station setup to send CW. During contest, I could hung out at 144.099 calling CQ, and I doubt I would get an answer. From my brief experience, hanging close to the calling frequency on 2 meters SSB is best within 5 kc either side for sending CW. As far as, CW and SSB having an exact mirror of the band plan, I think that would be great! I am not an EME, scatter, or digital guy so I do not have knowledge or want to invade on their turf. I think the calling frequency for 2 meters is to high. I know it has been that way for years. If it were like 6 meters, where CW activity is only 25 kcs away, it might generate more CW activity. Beacons on 2 meters are also different. On 6 meters you may listen below .100 for beacons and then come up the band to see if anyone in the CW portion, then if activity is good, go further to SSB. It just works on 6 meters, but 2 is a different story.

I have yet to run into a problem on 2 meters sending CW in the SSB portion of the band. I would love to have a place where I could dependable rely on and there might be someone listening. That is done on 6 metes, but not so much on 2 meters.

I encourage your spirit in getting more activity on these bands. It is a whole lot of fun when the bands are open and there is activity.

Jeffrey - KA2BKG
Bel Air, MD
FM19tm
----- Original Message ----- From: Herb Krumich <wa2fgk@yahoo.com> To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com Sent: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:01:33 -0000 (UTC) Subject: [VHFcontesting] 2 meters I would like to throw this around and see what others might feel about my idea. As everyone knows, our six meter band is segmented and we know exactly what mode to use and where. The last several years have been very effective when we go below 50.100 to do CW, and move up to do digital near 50.260. All SSB contacts are between 50.127 and 50.180, unless the band is open. EME is done around 50.200 Now lets talk about two meters. Most SSB activity is from 144.170 through 144.230. Rovers hang out a bit higher. This past contest, there was quite a mix up in the lower area. Stations trying to do scatter while others were trying to do EME. It can't work. The sequences are totally different and you can't work both modes in the same area. Most digital EME is between 144.110 and 144.130. I totally sug
gest using that area for EME and from 144.135 to 155 for scatter FSK. Everyone will be in the same sequence, and contacts will be made QRM free. On FSK stations to the east always transmit second, so you would have no QRM from other local stations. As for CW. I am told by some that it's an old mode no longer used. I don't buy it. If we would all go to the same area, your grid totals would swell. We have below 100 on two meters to enjoy some nice long distant contacts. It's being done on six meters, why not two meters. I suggest 144.080 to 144.100 to do battle. No SSB splatter and plenty of filters on our radios to make some great contacts. If a plan is gotten, I believe our enjoyment of the two meter band will be doubled Let's throw it up in the air. Herb K2LNS Stn mgr for the WA2FGK station _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>