Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Is it a Baku or is it a choke?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is it a Baku or is it a choke?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:16:13 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 12/12/2017 7:05 PM, Shane Youhouse wrote:
In designing the W2DU balun I compromised cost, physical size, and the amount
of shield current that could be tolerated that would result in
insignificant effect on the radiation pattern of the antenna. I made
the decision
that if the shield current was at least 20 dB less than that flowing onto
terminal B, the eff effect of the shield current on the radiation pattern
would negligible.

An excellent explanation, of course. Thanks for sharing it.

Note that it dates to the late '70s - early '80s, before the proliferation of noise from digital devices, switch-mode power supplies, variable speed motor drive controllers, and broadband radiation/leakage from CATV and DSL systems. Where Walt's 20 dB criteria was quite sufficient for controlling pattern distortion, greater suppression is desirable to prevent that noise coupling onto the transmission line. AND -- the one-size fits all math that yields that 20 dB is, IMO, oversimplification of the broad range of conditions in the real world to which the choke is applied. BTW -- it was W1HIS whose app note on chokes first articulated the virtue of a high choking Z for noise suppression, but he didn't understand the virtue of resistance nor of resonance, and he didn't understand how to measure them. Those were my contributions, which I published in 2005.

Note also that Walt's published work on this tested three designs for his choke -- good, better, and best. The difference was the number of beads in the string, and the only one that made it into commercial production was the cheapest one. Also, in a great piece of engineering, Walt carefully selected what was probably the only commercially available bead material, #73, that had the characteristic of a very low Q resonance centered on the HF bands, and the largest one in the Fair-Rite catalog was just large enough to fit the miniature coax he used to build the chokes. In my research, I learned a better way to achieve that low Q resonance at HF, how to control it, and how to get much higher choking Z (and thus better noise suppression and power handling) and for lower cost.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>