Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Crank Up Tower Conductivity

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Crank Up Tower Conductivity
From: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:44:35 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
So a lightning bolt comes down through two miles of AIR (which is an 
insulator), but it won't jump a gap .010" between the sliders on the tower legs?

Also, aren't crank up towers Ufer grounded by default, since the anchor bolts 
go a decent depth into the concrete?

Chris
KF7P




On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Don W7WLL wrote:

> That was the question I have Steve and I don't truly think it is a non-issue, 
> particularly with the crankup tower instructions I've read re lightning 
> protection.
> 
> My interest was piqued by the discussion of the requirement to ground all 
> cable legs, the number of ground rods to use, wire/strap size, etc. This is 
> just not feasible that I can see with a crankup so was interested in best 
> approach. Should I have more ground rods. If so, how should they be placed or 
> spread? Should I depend on a single base ear tower ground where that ear is 
> attached to the tower ear by just the pressure of the galvanized bolt 
> fastening? We suffer a lot of salt buildup on everything and depend of course 
> on anti-seize to ensure the bolts can be later separated. I see no way to 
> utilize the solutions suggested for fixed rigid towers such as the hefty and 
> costly clamps to crankups.
> 
> So, is the cable system within the crankup tower sufficient for a lightning 
> strike? The cables are well lubed (I live on the ocean and use the lube and 
> lube process recommended by the local marine cable rigger who installs tons 
> of rope cable on the fishing and crabbing fleet). As well, the cables are 
> connected only by contact to the pulley wheels and the thimble contact at the 
> ends.
> 
> Yes, the tower sections certainly touch in some way but my inner tower 
> section facings are lubricated, so am unsure just how robust the contact area 
> is.
> 
> Summary - just wondered what others did with their crankups re creating a 
> grounding system as robust as those that have been discussed for fixed towers 
> (or can you?).
> 
> Don W7WLL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:11 AM
> To: patrick_g@windstream.net ; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] height of ground rod at tower base
> 
>> The movable sections of a crank-up tower are never so perfectly balanced
> that they don't touch each other.? I suppose you could connect a wire
> from each section to the one below such that it reaches from clamp to
> clamp when the tower is fully raised and "bulges outward" in a non
> interfering manner when the tower is lowered.
> 
>   Isn't the tower already continuously conductive?  What about the cables 
> that connect each section? Isn't this a non-issue?
> 
> Cheers,
> Steve     K7LXC
> TOWER TECH
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>