Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted L Elev Radials EZNEC Model Wanted

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted L Elev Radials EZNEC Model Wanted
From: Les Kalmus <w2lk@bk-lk.com>
Reply-to: w2lk@bk-lk.com
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:51:28 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
  Take a look at this antenna by K2KQ:

http://www.n0hr.com/160m%20and%2080m%20Double%20L.htm

It's on N0HR's website but the original is by K2KQ. Google the call and 
you should find the original presentation.

Les W2LK

On 12/29/2010 5:44 PM, Clint Talmadge W5CPT wrote:
> Interesting antenna - can you supply the dimensions, especially how high the
> lower leg and feed point are?
>
> Clint Talmadge - W5CPT
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rik van Riel
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:19 PM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted L Elev Radials EZNEC Model Wanted
>
> On 12/29/2010 01:24 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> I made an EZNEC model of a 160M Inverted-L with one elevated radial.
>>  From the impedances I am seeing, I think I have something wrong.
>>
>> If you have an EZNEC model of a 160M Inverted-L with one or more
>> elevated radials, could you please send it to me. I'll inspect it and
>> modify it to fit my case.
> I've got one better than you - the double L.
>
> It takes up even less space than an inverted L with one elevated radial, and
> has the point of maximum current much higher above ground.
>
> In ASCII art, they look like this:
>
> +--------------------------------
> |
> |
> X
> |
> |
> +--------------------------------
>
> Mine consists of a little less than 260' of THHN wire.
> I have a choke balun at the feedpoint.
>
> I'll mail you the NEC file off list, since the list eats attachments.  My
> NEC file has very poor ground, since that's what I have here in New
> Hampshire.  You may want to modify the ground to be a little better.
>
> --
> All rights reversed.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>