| To: | "topband " <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Does this solar minimum seem a little more extreme than usual? |
| From: | donovanf@starpower.net |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:16:02 -0500 (EST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
We've had 92 percent spotless days since May 19th. The last time this happened was more than 100 years ago when there were 93% spotless days from Feb 28 to Oct 24, 1913 books.google.com/books?id=SWdCAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA68&lpg=PA68&dq=daily+sunspot+number+1912&source=bl&ots=p-7Rhel4dI&sig=ACfU3U0YMpFQ0tdADTYYhiyI-qcWOWdEPQ&hl=en&ppis=_e&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiM-s7o6rrmAhWQxVkKHbaZCHAQ6AEwCnoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=daily%20sunspot%20number%201912&f=false 73 Frank W3LPL _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Sunspots Break a Space Age Record, Mike Waters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Does this solar minimum seem a little more extreme than usual?, Richard McLachlan |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Sunspots Break a Space Age Record, Mike Waters |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Does this solar minimum seem a little more extreme than usual?, Richard McLachlan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |