To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long) |
From: | Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:58:04 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I just have one question about your suggestion about creating a "new" digi DXCC award and excluding JT/FT modes from mixed. Are those people (myself included) who have applied JT/FT credit to their Mixed award and received it as such going to have to mail the certificate back to the League and have the award retracted? It will be difficult to retroactively create a "new" award without including every mode in mixed, which by definition is mixed. Creating a "Mixed but without JT/FT modes" DXCC is getting into the splitting hairs and logistics nightmare ballpark. PS. I am also one of the <30 crowd. 73, Nick K1NZ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Topband: Fwd: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), DXer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), Dale Putnam |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long), Dale Putnam |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |