| To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? | 
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> | 
| Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:52:34 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
| A lot of hams on 160m have been similarly "shocked". :-) 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com> wrote: > > We were shocked to find that the existing 1/4 wl performed better than the > much taller [5/8 wave] Vertical. > _________________ Topband Reflector | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Clive GM3POI | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Clive GM3POI | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |