Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??
From: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:45:50 -0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Before you do Niko, read the Brown, Lewis and Epstein RCA report. 
73 Clive GM3POI

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Niko
Cimbur
Sent: 26 September 2013 14:37
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??



In the early 90's N6KB and I tried a 5/8 wl Vertical on 160m.
It was a wire vertical supported by a helium balloon and spaced several
hundred feet from a permanent 1/4 wl Vertical.
Both antennas had a similar, extensive radial system and they were both over
average ground.
We did many A/B comparisons during that contest weekend.
We were shocked to find that the existing 1/4 wl performed better than the
much taller Vertical.
This was around 1992 so we did not model anything but actually tried it.
After this the 5/8 antenna was never tried again.

Recently I have been having some toughts about again trying a 5/8 vertical
just for the fun of doing it. 
Actually I am thinking about setting up a few Vertical antennas of different
sizes,
maybe four of them and do a comparison of their actual performance over very
good ground.
They would be sized from a 5/8 wl vertical down to a short whip. 
All of them would be set up about 1/2 mile or so out over the Ocean.
I already have a permanent 60' tall bottom loaded vertical there.

I am not interested in making contacts, just receiving signal reports.

Nothing permanent, this would be a one time deal.


I am wondering if there is any interest in participating in this.

Any Suggestions are welcome.

Niko AC6DD  
_________________
Topband Reflector

_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>