| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: ARRL 160 Conditions |
| From: | Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:11:37 -0800 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Lots of useful stuff posted, but I haven't seen anything on why propagation was so poor. Is this is a function of solar flux up, 160m down, or what? It's often said that 160/80 are much better at the bottom of the cycle, so do the lowbanders now have to wait several more years? Brian VE7JKZ _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: H40KJ, Jacek SP5DRH |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160, Rick Karlquist |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: ARRL 160 conditions, n8ie |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: ARRL 160 viewed from EU, Dr. Wolf Ostwald |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |