Cebik was one of the antenna greats. Co author of the ARRL antenna handbook
for some time. And a lot of his work is preserved with
free access (you need to create a login though) on the cebik.com web site.
If you are serious about antennas, this is a great site.
73, Jeff ACØC
www.ac0c.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Julius Fazekas
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:45 AM
To: W2PM
Cc: Mike(W5UC) ; Guy Olinger K2AV ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting
L. B. Cebik, W4RNL ~ 1939 - 2008 ~ SK as of April 2008
Julius Fazekas
N2WN
Tennessee Contest Group
http://k4tcg.org/
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/
Elecraft K2 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #
________________________________
From: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
To: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Cc: Mike(W5UC) <w5uc@suddenlink.net>; Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>;
"topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting
Who is LB??
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 23, 2011, at 8:33, Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I attended a presentation LB gave to the ETDXA shortly before hi untimely
> death. I found him engaging and informative. He was well
> thought of in East Tennessee.
>
>
> I have to say that when I became active again in 2003, I found his website
> invaluable as a antenna resource. Some of the language
> was repetitive, but the antennas built based on the articles were quite
> effective. My 40m half square immediately comes to mind.
> "Verticals without Vertigo" is still a favorite of mine.
>
> He did do antenna building/testing, but usually wire antennas and he enjoyed
> PVC builds. Think it was more space limitations than
> health issues. He was a great advocate of modelling. That, of course, is
> still contentious to some schools of thought.
>
> As to gruff replies, ambiguous writings, dubious analysis, and such, I know
> I've been guilty of that and experienced it from
> others. With some, we managed to get over the hump and find common ground,
> with others it hasn't happened yet.
>
>
> I, for one, am thankful that folks like LB, Rudy, Jim, Tom and others share
> and post useful information. They have helped me more
> than hindered...
>
> Happy Thanksgiving to all and see you on the Top Band this weekend in CQ WW
> DX!
>
> 73,
> Julius
>
>
>
> Julius Fazekas
> N2WN
>
>
> Tennessee Contest Group
> http://k4tcg.org/
> http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
>
>
> Tennessee QSO Party
> http://www.tnqp.org/
>
>
> Elecraft K2 #4455
> Elecraft K3/100 #366
> Elecraft K3/100 #
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
> To: Mike(W5UC) <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
> Cc: topband@contesting.com
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting
>
> I found LB to be a little enigmatic. But so what?
>
> His forte' was modelling. He had all the professional licenses and
> did commercial modeling for some number of customers, including a lot
> of unheralded primary work for the well-regarded Force 12 antennas. He
> did not do a lot of on-field verification himself, which would explain
> why some fairly suspect material remains. I'm fairly sure he did not
> have the health for the hard outdoor work that validation requires,
> though he never complained. But all in all, I'm certainly better off
> for him than without him. RIP, and let detractors look to their own
> assumptions closets. I'm completely sure LB has far fewer detractors
> than I do. I have a series of posts with him about the Wouff Houng
> which I treasure.
>
> 73, Guy.
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Mike(W5UC) <w5uc@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>> On 11/22/2011 9:29 AM, DAVID CUTHBERT wrote:
>>> L.B. was a professor of Philosophy and not a degreed engineer.
>>>
>>> Dave WX7G
>>> On Nov 22, 2011 8:08 AM, "ZR"<zr@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>>>
>> I got into it with L. B. several years ago. He published something((I
>> don't remember what) that was quite ambiguous, and I dropped him an
>> e-mail asking him to be more specific. He replied by accusing me of
>> being demanding. I found another source to reference in solving my
>> problem and moved on.
>>
>> 73,
>> Mike, W5UC
>> _______________________________________________
>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|