To: | topBand List <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Easy Inverted L for 169 (NCJ M/A 2011) Info Needed |
From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:54:26 +0000 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote: > If the feedpoint is elevated you should have 4 tuned radials. The antenna efficiency will improve as you add more elevated radials beyond just 4. Eight to fifteen feet of feedpoint elevation isn't sufficient to reach theoretical efficiency with just 4 elevated radials on 160M. And no, the radial length isn't necessarily the same as the radiator length - they need to be tuned and pruned as they are installed and greatly influenced by ground proximity. Tuning is typically done in pairs. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Beverage transformer enclosures, Dave Mueller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Beverage transformer enclosures, George Dubovsky |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Easy Inverted L for 169 (NCJ M/A 2011) Info Needed, ZR |
Next by Thread: | Topband: VE7MID/VE2 VE2/JA8BMK Zone 2 operations, VE7MID |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |