RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33

To: "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 135, Issue 33
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:35:43 +0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Peter N5UWY wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:01 AM, John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net> wrote:
> 
> > Most of what I see is a "position report"
> > see    http://www.winlink.org/userPositions
> > date, time deg's north/south by east/west.
> > Or something like tell mom I will be in PORT NAMED tomorrow.
> 
> So why do the sailors insist that they need huge swathes of bandwidth to
> transmit a few bytes of data?

Most of them...at least the clueful ones... know they don't need much bandwidth 
for position reports (although the need for ARQ does add to the overhead).

The need for bandwidth/speed arises when there's a message waiting from someone 
who doesn't realize brevity is a virtue.

It doesn't take much of a message for a narrow sub-300bps signal to become 
painfully slow, and potentially problematic if conditions aren't the best.

(This isn't to say, however, that more couldn't be done to more efficiently use 
the automated subbands.)

-- 
Michael / N1EN
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>