kind along the same lines, sort of, I also have a ft857d , a great do
all rig.. in it I now have a 500hz filter--my question to the group,
is there a way to use either this filter , or the digital filer when
running afsk?? Having filter in this mode would be of great help
especially on the dx end... thanks good luck k 73 john w8wej
(from my reading of the manual, it seems like the filters are dedicated
to either cw or ssb)--
On 8/13/2011 12:28, larry fields wrote:
> hello am new to this group and often times read when I can the info
> here. I just purchased a new yaesu FT857d and plan to operate in
> January on RTTY and PSK31,JT65HF when I get back to my home in the
> Philippines.
>
> I work alot of dx on the other side of the world as well, and when I
> worked a few pile ups on 6m a few years back it was pretty difficult
> to pick out some calls, many I did work was the ones who threw there
> calls at the end of the pile. Unfortunately many tried to walk over
> the ones I was replying to. But I kept at it until the band closed
> out,or had to leave for a meal or c/r run.
>
> Am still learning from the group here and hope the yaesu ft857d or my
> other rig the icom706mk2 works good for me.
>
> 73 from the coast line of Japan
>
> Larry
>
> On 8/12/11, rtty-request@contesting.com<rtty-request@contesting.com> wrote:
>> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
>> rtty@contesting.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> rtty-request@contesting.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> rtty-owner@contesting.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Response to DX Station (Don AA5AU)
>> 2. Re: Response to DX Station (Mike Fatchett W0MU)
>> 3. Re: Response to DX Station (Neal Campbell)
>> 4. Re: reply to DXer/Contesters (Neal Campbell)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: Don AA5AU<aa5au@bellsouth.net>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>> To: RTTY contest group<rtty@contesting.com>
>> Message-ID:
>> <1313170861.61742.YahooMailNeo@web180413.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>>
>> Peter wrote:? "If only all DX would call USA stations by number!"
>> ?
>> I hate when DX stations go by numbers.? It's a cop out for those who do not
>> know how to handle a pileup.? It's?penalizes?good operators from getting in
>> and getting out of the pileup and it does not take into consideration
>> propagation openings to certain parts of the world/USA/whatever...
>> ?
>> 73, Don AA5AU
>>
>> From: Peter Laws<plaws@plaws.net>
>>> To: RTTY contest group<rtty@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:31 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 20:30, Ron Kolarik<rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code of Conduct it
>>>> might help
>>>> http://dx-code.org/
>>> I agree with all of these, but ....
>>>
>>> o I will not trust the DX cluster and will be sure of the DX station's
>>> call sign before calling.
>>>
>>> Very difficult when the DX end goes for along time without IDing at
>>> all.? Worth it, of course, but very difficult.
>>>
>>>
>>> o? I will not transmit when the DX station requests geographic areas
>>> other than mine.
>>>
>>> If only all DX would call USA stations by number!
>>>
>>>
>>> o? When the DX operator calls me, I will not repeat my call sign
>>> unless I think he has copied it incorrectly.
>>>
>>> By FCC rule, I must identify every 10 minutes and at the end of a
>>> communication, so I will repeat my call at the end.? Sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:55:35 -0600
>> From: Mike Fatchett W0MU<w0mu@w0mu.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>> To: rtty@contesting.com
>> Message-ID:<4E456917.50000@w0mu.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> I have to admit to doing that too but not with stations like ST0R or
>> BS7H. I will work them once per band/mode unless I feel my contact was
>> less than certain.
>>
>> I can't fault people for wanting to break piles. It does rub me wrong
>> when I am trying to work something on a tough path and someone works the
>> guy and tells the world that this the 29th time they have worked on this
>> band yadayadayada........
>>
>> On 8/12/2011 11:34 AM, Don AA5AU wrote:
>>> I always feel the "need" to bust a pileup even if I don't "need" it. It's
>>> the fun of it that drives people to work stations they don't "need" for an
>>> award. Some people don't even chase awards, but they "need" to bust a
>>> pileup or just work the DX.
>>>
>>> I've been going through DX'ing withdrawl since ST0R went QRT. I did get a
>>> "fix" last night when I worked TY1KS on 80M CW for a new band country.
>>> Some of us are just plain addicted to
>>> DX'ing/Contesting/Anything-to-do-with-ham-radio.
>>>
>>> I'm going through RTTY contesting withdrawl too, but hope to "fix" that
>>> need next weekend in SARTG.
>>>
>>> 73, Don AA5AU
>>>
>>> From: Mike Fatchett W0MU<w0mu@w0mu.com>
>>>> To: rtty@contesting.com
>>>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:51 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>>>>
>>>> The one problem with online "logs" is that the DX could have busted a
>>>> call and logged me instead of W1MU or W9MU. In your scenario I would be
>>>> penalized because they busted the contact.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how many people feel the need to work DX peditions multiple
>>>> times when they know they have a solid contact.
>>>>
>>>> W0MU
>>>>
>>>> On 8/12/2011 4:17 AM, Shelby Summerville wrote:
>>>>> K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX Code
>>>>> of
>>>>> Conduct it might help http://dx-code.org/";
>>>>>
>>>>> As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying" attempts
>>>>> to
>>>>> stay at the top of the Honor Roll exists, the DX Code of Conduct is not
>>>>> applicapable! For the few that "work them and shut up", many, many more
>>>>> try
>>>>> and work them on as many bands/modes as possible. I await the day a
>>>>> "rare"
>>>>> DXpedition, that has online log availability, and publishes their
>>>>> operating
>>>>> style, penalizes duplicate band callers by removing all of their other
>>>>> contacts? If one is sure that they are in the online log, I see
>>>>> absolutely
>>>>> no reason for another attempt, on the same band. In the case of a new
>>>>> entity, "once per band/mode" should be enforced? I also believe that the
>>>>> DX
>>>>> has most of the responsibility of "controlling the pileup"?
>>>>>
>>>>> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:15:26 -0400
>> From: Neal Campbell<abrohamneal@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>> To: Mike Fatchett W0MU<w0mu@w0mu.com>
>> Cc: rtty@contesting.com
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAKLh0TeGPzY8eXe5faksZ3SKDgF_7kWbJLjKztJuDqnLCsw3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> I do not think its the "highly skilled" dx'er with a competitive urge that
>> makes things so slow, its the guys who are not on the air a lot but want
>> some new DX that pile on, don't listen, keep calling when the dx is trying
>> to work someone else. The Mikes and Dons are in and out so quickly that we
>> hardly notice them unless we hear the dx calling them.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Mike Fatchett W0MU<w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have to admit to doing that too but not with stations like ST0R or
>>> BS7H. I will work them once per band/mode unless I feel my contact was
>>> less than certain.
>>>
>>> I can't fault people for wanting to break piles. It does rub me wrong
>>> when I am trying to work something on a tough path and someone works the
>>> guy and tells the world that this the 29th time they have worked on this
>>> band yadayadayada........
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2011 11:34 AM, Don AA5AU wrote:
>>>> I always feel the "need" to bust a pileup even if I don't "need" it.
>>> It's the fun of it that drives people to work stations they don't "need"
>>> for an award. Some people don't even chase awards, but they "need" to
>>> bust
>>> a pileup or just work the DX.
>>>> I've been going through DX'ing withdrawl since ST0R went QRT. I did get
>>> a "fix" last night when I worked TY1KS on 80M CW for a new band country.
>>> Some of us are just plain addicted to
>>> DX'ing/Contesting/Anything-to-do-with-ham-radio.
>>>> I'm going through RTTY contesting withdrawl too, but hope to "fix" that
>>> need next weekend in SARTG.
>>>> 73, Don AA5AU
>>>>
>>>> From: Mike Fatchett W0MU<w0mu@w0mu.com>
>>>>> To: rtty@contesting.com
>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:51 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to DX Station
>>>>>
>>>>> The one problem with online "logs" is that the DX could have busted a
>>>>> call and logged me instead of W1MU or W9MU. In your scenario I would
>>>>> be
>>>>> penalized because they busted the contact.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how many people feel the need to work DX peditions
>>>>> multiple
>>>>> times when they know they have a solid contact.
>>>>>
>>>>> W0MU
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/12/2011 4:17 AM, Shelby Summerville wrote:
>>>>>> K0IDT wrote: "If you could get everyone to read and abide by the DX
>>> Code of
>>>>>> Conduct it might help http://dx-code.org/";
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As long as DXCC Challenge, DeSoto Cup and the "ego satisfying"
>>>>>> attempts
>>> to
>>>>>> stay at the top of the Honor Roll exists, the DX Code of Conduct is
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> applicapable! For the few that "work them and shut up", many, many
>>>>>> more
>>> try
>>>>>> and work them on as many bands/modes as possible. I await the day a
>>> "rare"
>>>>>> DXpedition, that has online log availability, and publishes their
>>> operating
>>>>>> style, penalizes duplicate band callers by removing all of their other
>>>>>> contacts? If one is sure that they are in the online log, I see
>>> absolutely
>>>>>> no reason for another attempt, on the same band. In the case of a new
>>>>>> entity, "once per band/mode" should be enforced? I also believe that
>>> the DX
>>>>>> has most of the responsibility of "controlling the pileup"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RTTY mailing list
>>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Abroham Neal Software
>> www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
>> Work:(540) 645 5394
>> Mobile:(540) 645 8171
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:19:23 -0400
>> From: Neal Campbell<abrohamneal@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] reply to DXer/Contesters
>> To: Bill<w9ol@billnjudy.com>
>> Cc: rtty@contesting.com
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAKLh0TdxWMXbJQ=9E61KPt5uCTUV-cG2BHd3-brD4SO4D430Eg@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> How about
>> "CQ from good ops only"
>>
>> or
>> "CQ K3NC.."
>>
>> Hi HI!
>> Neal
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Bill<w9ol@billnjudy.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How bout.....hihi
>>>
>>> a cq from the dx station with
>>> "CQ weak stations only!"
>>>
>>> or
>>> "CQ medium power stations only!"
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> "CQ only high power, super mega antennas, mega amps only"
>>>
>>> It would be interesting to see who chose to call in each of these subsets.
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL LOL
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------
>>> 96.37% of all statistics are made up.
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Bill H. in Chicagoland
>>> webcams at http://w9ol-towercam.webhop.org
>>> weather at http://hhweather.webhop.org
>>> live weathercam chat hhweather.chatango.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Abroham Neal Software
>> www.abrohamnealsoftware.com
>> Work:(540) 645 5394
>> Mobile:(540) 645 8171
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>>
>> End of RTTY Digest, Vol 104, Issue 25
>> *************************************
>>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3831 - Release Date: 08/13/11
> 06:34:00
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|