To: | <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] cheating |
From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:18:07 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:57:52 -0600, "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote: >So I guess operators should be judged and put in their own categories >because they are better than you? Really? REPLY: Operators that are better than me already have their own category. They're called "winners". :-) I don't mind (too much) being beat by someone who is simply better at contesting than I am. I do mind it when he uses hardware (second radio) to gain an advantage. That's why, when I run high power, I don't compare my scores against low power ops. That would be unfair, just like two radios against one is unfair. I run HP because I am impatient, not because I want to run up a high score. If others have more patience, good for them. I don't expect their scores to be in the same category with mine because it simply would not be fair to them. I do not want to outscore someone because I have an amp and they don't. Same with two radios vs one. No one should have to have an amp to be competitive and the same with a second radio. Thaa's why sports have categories to begin with - competing on a level playing field to the greatest extent possible. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Bill, W6WRT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] cheating, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, WS7I |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |