To: | "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>, <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating |
From: | "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:24:07 -0600 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I guess we need a category for single radio multiple decoders too? Isn't this a big advantage? Where exactly do you draw the line and how? It takes great skill to be able to do SO2R competitively. Hardware is just one piece that makes it easier. It is the grey stuff between the ears that allows an operator to excel, especially on CW and SSB. A lousy op is not going to win the next big contest by adding a 2nd rig/xmitter/etc. RTTY SO2R is a natural as you have so much time waiting as you xmit. I don't know how people did RTTY contests before SO2R. I would have been bored to death waiting anxiously for my rig to unkey. W0MU CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Eric - VE3GSI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Cheating, Bill, W6WRT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |