To: | Phil Duff & Ann Duff <na4m@arrl.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] 6 Meters |
From: | Steve AI9T <steve@ai9t.com> |
Date: | Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:44:43 -0400 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
OK,, 50.300 it is .I don't care what frequency lets just make it firm. 6 meters is hard enough to find someone to work especially on RTTY. -- 73 Steve AI9T http://www.ai9t.com QSL via LOTW and EQsL Phil Duff & Ann Duff wrote: > Take a look here for 6M band plans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_meters > > USA/NA > 50.100 - 50.300 is SSB/CW > 50.300 - 50.600 All modes > > 73 Phil NA4M > > > Steve AI9T wrote: > >> I think 50.180 makes more sense. I tried for over an hour earlier with >> no luck. If the folks on this reflector don't settle on a frequency we >> will never make any 6 meter QSO's. >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1477 - Release Date: 6/1/2008 > 5:28 PM > -- 73 Steve AI9T http://www.ai9t.com QSL via LOTW and EQsL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] 6 Meters, Phil Duff & Ann Duff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RTTY] 6M RTTY, Russell Blair |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 6 Meters, Phil Duff & Ann Duff |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] 6 Meters, jeff stai |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |