RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] WPX thoughts

To: RTTY List <RTTY@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX thoughts
From: Vilnis YL2KF <yl2kf@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:40:42 +0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

>>
>> Just a few thoughts about WPX that I have been thinking about.
>>
>> Was it just me, or were there a lot of stations sending a report before they
>> had even been acknowledged?
>> I frequently encountered this:
>> CQ WPX DE GU0SUP CQ
>> TU UR 599 001 001 DE XX1XX KN
>> XX1XX TU 599 100 100 100 DE GU0SUP
>> and then nothing back! What does everyone else do in situations like this? I
>> logged them, but I am not too happy with this.
>>
>>     

Hi Phil and all ,
Ohhh,  Yes, quite a common, still. This is definitely not a "fat finger" 
syndrome.
There is some other diagnosis - "ithinkiamfastandclever" or arount that  
:-)  .
Personally I have one macro for that - I NEED YOUR CALL ONLY -
and do not give report for him.  Don't ask how is labeled this macro ;-) .
Only "medicine" is to teach a PSKers (sorry) to read more and promote  
a   good
RTTY contesting (bdw also DXing) practice not only in Don 's AA5AU homepage.
73
Vilnis / YL2KF


>> The cluster: As always, some folk send spots based on their rig frequency,
>> not the MARK frequency.
>> Most times, this isn't a problem, but over the weekend, I encountered a few
>> instances where I was running on the frequency of a spot that came through
>> for another call.
>> I then ended up with this:
>> CQ WPX DE GU0SUP CQ
>> DE XX1XX XX1XX KN
>> XX1XX TU 599 100 100 100 DE GU0SUP
>> AA5AU TU UR 599 001 001 DE XX1XX KN
>> And then they were gone before I could get them to correct my call! Again,
>> what does everyone else do?
>>
>>     
>   
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>