----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>
To: "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Will You Let FCC Kill PACTOR3?
> On Dec 27, 2007 12:23 PM, Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> RM-11392 pretty much attempts to keep Pactor III in particular, and
>> automatic stations in general, from interfering with keyboard digital
>> modes. Just MHO, of course.
>
>
> And this would be bad ... why? Automatic == bad, IMHO, whether it's
> Pactor or RTTY or Morse and as you said, 1500 kHz is plenty of
> bandwidth. Far from (what word was used?) "stifling" amateur
> innovation, forcing narrower bandwidth should do just the opposite.
>
> I admit to not clicking through to TFA, but I don't think it's an ARRL
> petition and we all know that the FCC only mangles ARRL proposals.
> :-P
>
> --
> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
The message calling it a "terrible" petition was posted by none other than
Bonnie, KQ6XA, the HFLINK/ALE queen. Just one more of her self-serving
paranoid rants. RM-11392 is only bad if you're one of Bonnie's mindless
followers....
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|