Dick, if I remember correctly, the reason N1MM Logger doesn't assign a
number automatically is because when the program is set up for
multi-operator operation, in some contests the serial number is used over
multiple bands, and when it operates as the program does (not assigning a
serial number until the space bar is hit) the serial number isn't assigned
(and reserved) until you do this.
Alan - N7BF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
To: "RTTY Contesting" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:44 AM
Subject: [RTTY] FW: WPX contest
> Peter and Jerry,
> I don't think you understood what I was saying, or else I was not clear
> enough. I did not have a problem with N1MM incrementing the serial
> numbers.
> It incremented the numbers correctly on both sending and logging. I did
> not
> have to do it manually.
>
> What I encountered was this - after I put a call in the call box the 4
> exchange boxes remained grayed out
> ( SentRST/ReceivedRST/Sent nr/received nr)until I hit the space bar. The
> next nr was there but grayed out until I hit the space bar.
>
> The sequence was this in S&P CALL - space bar - F5 send exchange - log it
> (CALL TU 599 123 123 de KS0M). All ok.
>
> If I did not hit the space bar and sent CALL - F5 send exchange - unable
> to log as no number.
>
> BUT the F5 sent anyway - CALL TU 599 000 000 de KS0M.
> I then hit the space bar to highlight the exch. boxes and sent the REPT
> Exchange (my F6) to give out the correct number (NR 123 123 123 123 de
> KS0M). I did not have to manually increment the serial numbers.
>
> I don't remember having to hit the space bar previously. But, I really am
> not sure what I did in the last contest. I will see what happens in the
> next
> RTTY contest.
>
> 73 Dick KS0M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Peter Laws
> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:43 PM
> To: RTTY
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX contest
>
>
> On 2/12/07, Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net> wrote:
>> So THAT explains it! I wondered why I got a couple of 000's. I had no
>> idea N1MM actually required the operator to manually increment the
> counter.
>
> It doesn't. Log the Q and the next one up has the next higher number.
> If it didn't ... what would be the point?
> --
> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|