Well it is now severall month I'm testing with great satisfaction
Signal Link SL-1+ like Tom, NU4G.
I agree on his comment really simple to interconnect and the on
board circuit doesnt require the use of any specific comport.
Tested with a couple of buyed program and also with other free
73's de Luciano, I5FLN
----- Original Message -----
From: <rtty-request@contesting.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 6:00 PM
Subject: RTTY Digest, Vol 29, Issue 8
> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
> rtty@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rtty-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rtty-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Rigblaster- worth the money? (Tom Norris)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 11:42:21 -0500
> From: Tom Norris <r390a@bellsouth.net>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster- worth the money?
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Message-ID: <74A53896-3273-409A-BDC8-44FF5F8E1738@bellsouth.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Bill and the group.
>
> I use a Signal Link SL-1+
>
> Not only did it cost less, but it doesn't use up a com port.
> It has it's own "vox" circuit built in, just connect to your
> rig, hook up audio in/out, and you're ready to go.
>
> As for homebrew, the circuit is very simple for this and
> any of the other interfaces. Couple of small transformers
> to isolate audio, an optoisolator if you are using a comm port
> to provide TX, if not a small audio amp ckt to detect tone and
> turn on a transistor switch.
>
> 73
>
> Tom NU4G
>
> > My main interest with a rigblaster or similar interface is the fact
> > that you
> > can have multiple features in one box. The way my setup is now, I can
> > either use CAT or digital modes, but not both. Lack of ports and
> > such are
> > keeping me from using rig control while going digital. I have
> > tried several
> > configurations and none seem to work as of yet. And yes, my CI-V
> > unit is
> > homebrew.
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> End of RTTY Digest, Vol 29, Issue 8
> ***********************************
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|