To: | "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Karlnet] Flashrom units... |
From: | "Nenad Orlic" <internet@madnet.co.yu> |
Reply-to: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Date: | Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:40:10 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
> I speak only from experience, so my info is gathered from our network, not hypothetical > situations. If anyone else has any experience with FlashROM units > please let me know what has/hasn't worked for you. Thanks. Well, we were using Flashrom units until recently and the ARE best preforming. BUT! First problem with them is problem of space - you don't have allways enough space on the roof for them and second one is that they have a lot more points-of-failure becouse they are build on a pc. But our experiance is same - whenever you can use FlashROM units. Of course, that does not resolve bad pooling that has some usages, but... greetings, Nenad |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Steve Deaton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Dan Metcalf |
Previous by Thread: | [Karlnet] Is this interference?, Brett Hays |
Next by Thread: | [Karlnet] Solar Flares..does this sound credible?, Brett Hays |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |