To: | "'Tim Shoppa'" <tshoppa@gmail.com>, "'Jeff Stai'" <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness |
From: | "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com> |
Reply-to: | ed@w0yk.com |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2016 07:42:34 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
CQ WW RTTY was designed from the beginning with US/VE states/areas as multipliers to encourage the world to work NA as much as EU. The "world", of course, is predominantly EU and NA in terms of participation so these two population regions are more equal in terms of available multipliers across distances and bands. This multiplier configuration is not a temporary crutch to bolster activity. It's what made sense to the contest's founders and the current director. Contests don't have to all have the same rules. Diversity is good. Ed W0YK ________________________________________________________________________ Tim N3QE wrote: Most RTTY contests have always allowed in-country QSO's to count for points to drum up the rates to a level to keep it interesting for the whole period. If RTTY becomes substantially more popular then maybe in CQWW RTTY they could put in-country Q's at zero points (I have heard at least one RTTY contest director wonder out loud if his contest is reaching this tipping point yet.) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R, Jeff AC0C |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Tim Shoppa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Jeff Stai |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |